For developers, land investors, and acquisition teams in Poland. Compare multiple parcels, surface planning and infrastructure risks, and get a ranked shortlist instead of raw data dumps.
| Plot ID | Area | Zoning | Suitability | Risk | Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0142/7 Piaseczno, Mazowieckie |
1,240 m² | Residential | Low | Ready | |
0287/3 Pruszków, Mazowieckie |
2,100 m² | Residential | Medium | Ready | |
0519/1 Legionowo, Mazowieckie |
1890 m² | Mixed-use | Medium | Partial | |
0833/12 Wołomin, Mazowieckie |
1,680 m² | Residential | High | None | |
0061/5 Grodzisk Maz., Mazowieckie |
3,020 m² | Residential | Low | Ready |
Professional buyers still jump between public portals, planning documents, and single-plot reports that were not designed for fast acquisition decisions.
Your team evaluates parcels individually across Geoportal, ULDK, municipal planning documents, and other registries. Valuable expert time gets spent on weak candidates before real prioritization even begins.
Most tools help you retrieve information about one plot at a time. Acquisition teams need a consistent framework to compare candidates, surface red flags, and decide what deserves deeper review.
As municipalities update planning documents and policy assumptions, static screenshots become less useful. Buyers need a process that tracks planning context and highlights what changed for a target area.
Without standardized screening logic, every analyst weighs criteria differently. That makes portfolio-level comparison slower, less transparent, and harder to repeat across markets or municipalities.
Built for the stage before full due diligence: helping acquisition teams compare candidates, reject weak plots faster, and focus expert attention where it matters.
Evaluate 5–100+ parcels against one screening framework. Receive a ranked shortlist with fit scores, red flags, and clear next-step recommendations for your acquisition pipeline.
Define your target profile (e.g., "residential or mixed-use plots near Warsaw, 800–3000 m², utility access preferred"). We screen the target area and return a shortlist worth manual follow-up.
Review the factors that usually slow or kill a deal: planning constraints, infrastructure readiness, environmental flags, access context, and transaction signals where available.
Monitor target municipalities and existing holdings for planning updates, zoning shifts, and other signals that may change parcel attractiveness or timing.
The output is meant to help your team decide what to advance, what to monitor, and what to reject early — not to replace full legal or technical due diligence.
A prioritized view of the parcels that best fit your acquisition profile, with weaker candidates filtered down or removed.
Clear notes on planning, infrastructure, access, environmental, and other issues that may slow the deal or require deeper review.
Each parcel is framed around a practical next step: pursue, monitor, reject, or send for deeper diligence.
A few lightweight previews showing how SolumIntel structures the brief, evaluates parcels, narrows down opportunities, and monitors planning changes over time.
SolumIntel first interprets the acquisition brief, then structures parcel signals, turns them into one score, and ends with a practical next step for the team.
Draft assumptions changed for residential intensity in the monitored area. Review shortlist impact before the next acquisition round.
A target corridor now shows stronger utility readiness, improving the attractiveness of several medium-ranked parcels.
One high-fit parcel remains interesting, but timing risk increased. Keep it monitored rather than sending it straight to full diligence.
These are illustrative visual examples intended to show the style and structure of the product, not final screenshots from a live platform.
Send parcel IDs, addresses, coordinates, or simply describe the target profile you want to pursue. Tell us what matters most in your acquisition logic.
We combine relevant public, municipal, and licensed sources where available, then standardize the findings into one screening framework for comparison, scoring, and red-flag review.
Receive a report that helps your team decide what to advance, what to monitor, and what to reject before spending more time on deep diligence.
Shortlist residential and mixed-use candidates faster. Give acquisition managers a clearer first-pass view before legal, design, and technical teams go deeper.
Create a consistent screening layer across acquisition opportunities and existing holdings. Compare candidates faster and keep a closer eye on planning-driven upside or risk.
Use the same screening logic for early site review when infrastructure access, environmental constraints, and planning compatibility matter before deeper feasibility work.
Each parcel is reviewed through the same lens so your team can compare opportunities, understand trade-offs, and decide what deserves deeper work.
Compare a short list or a large batch in one structured report instead of stitching together separate parcel lookups and expert notes.
This is for teams deciding what to pursue next, what to park, and what to reject early — before spending budget on full legal, technical, or design diligence.
The methodology is shaped around Polish public data, municipal planning materials, and the realities of screening land across changing local planning environments.